exhibit reviews:
Jamie
Shovlin ,
Talbot Rice Gallery
Edinburgh, UK
by Rea Cris
Jeremy
Mora,Mark
Wolfe Contemporary Art
San Francisco, CA
by Tonya Warner
Carsten
Holler,
Tate Modern
London, UK
by Rea Cris
Marcus
Oakley,
Analogue Books
Edinburgh, UK
by Rea Cris
Susannah
Bettag,
Frey Norris Gallery
San Francisco, CA
by Tonya Warner
Trenton
Doyle Hancock,
Fruitmarket Gallery
Edinburgh, UK
by Rea Cris
My
Love is a 187,
Luggage Store Gallery
San Francisco, CA
by Klaus Menziel
|

Jamie Shovlin: Aggregate
Talbot Rice Gallery
Edinburgh, UK
20 Jan – 10 March 2007
Review by Rea Cris
For its first exhibition of 2007, the Talbot Rice Gallery has collected
together a series of new commissioned work by Becks Futures nominee Jamie
Shovlin. Shovlin has been described as a collector, archivist, and manipulator.
His work revolves around the precise methodology of collecting, classifying
and displaying information, complete with museum conventions of labels,
models, diagrams, and scientific documentation, all of which are meant
to be taken as true. Shovlin uses these assumed coveyors of objective, unquestionable
truth in order to create and manipulate the data of his installations.
His fabricated fan archive of the equally fabricated West German Band
Lustfast is a prime example of the power of persuasion that museum archives
hold. The archive fooled many into believing in the existence of the band,
with their Wikipedia entry and MySpace
page.
In this exhibit, he presents a painstakingly neat map of Great Britain, indicating with string where
and in what condition he bought road maps, all neatly documented in specially
made index cards in “Landrangers Map’s Map”. Add this to the intricate
colour wheel accompanying “In Search of Perfect Harmony” indicating
which Crayola crayon was used for which jigsaw, and the blatant misinformation
in “The Birds in her Garden,” with its scientific names such
a ‘Roger the Wood Pigeon’ and ‘Evil Bastard the Magpie’,
one finds Shovlin is an archivist/collector/deceiver extordinaire.
But the exhibition does not equal his work; the show is still very much
based in the white cube tradition of art galleries, rather than the scientific
glass case displays of musuemology. Half the charm of scientific or, more
specifically, wildlife museums and their displays of maps, drawings and
taxidermied specimens, is their stuffiness due to the lack of space, their
displays dusty and forgotten. Shovlin’s own imitation is too spacious,
too self-aware of its own parody. The walls are too white, the displays
too free of dust, everything is crisp and clean. The spacious white cube
exhibition style makes it feel more like art than a scientific fact, which
ruins the illusion Shovlin worked so hard to create. The accompanying
information leaflet arouses further suspicion. The amateurish and cheap
nature of the leaflet reminds me of the makeshift activity sheets teachers
handed out to use during school trips to museums. The Talbot Rice leaflet
has floor plans and indicators of where each piece can be found, as it
has decided to opt out of the information placard. But more interesting
is the accompanying diagram, resembling the categorization of animals
(think back to science class, with class and kingdoms). The exhibition
has been chopped and broken down into categories, the most bizarre being
‘Selected text from Exhibition Catalogue’. The descriptions
are full of words like ‘systematic observation’, ‘recorded
everything’, ‘meticulous method of display’, ‘classification’,
‘labels’, and ‘obsessive accumulator’. This further
destroys the illusion that Shovlin’s displays are to be taken as
true fact. There is no indication of who made or produced this chart,
it confuses and irritates me. It is too amateurish compared to the impressive
work of Shovlin and too random to be beneficial either. The chart is a
hindrance to the rest of his carefully accumulated and displayed work.
Focusing on Shovlin’s panache for deliberate misguidance is missing
the more interesting aspect of his work. The aesthetics of his work is
just as important as the act of accumulation and content. Shovlin’s“The
Origins of Species” is Darwin’s book with large sections of
text blacked out, revealing only what the artist finds relevant and making
you realize that you never had the intention of reading the book until
that moment. This piece is presented on mounted boards with windows displaying
the single pages. Different editions of the book are mixed in, some boards
alternating the editions from page to page, while others are complete
mixtures. Looking at these mounted boards from afar they begin to resemble
town houses, sombre and serious, all perfectly lined up in a row.
The aspect I found most interesting about Shovlin’s work is his
mother’s affection for jigsaw puzzles and what it means in his work.
Strangely enough I believe to have found the answer in the Aggregate resource
room; a room filled with additional information about Shovlin’s work,
newspaper reviews and, for the children, photocopies of the birds that
can be coloured in. What is also available are multi-coloured office stickies
that can be written upon and stuck directly onto the wall. A more charming
specimen asks whether cowboys have back gardens. Someone has responded
‘we ain’t got no garden, we ain’t got nowhere but our
saddles’. The stickie that most caught my eye was one declaring,
on classic yellow: ‘I have the beautiful view of a perfect garden
from my flat without having to keep it’. This statement is obviously
referring the Shovlin’s work “The Birds in her Garden”.
And this is what got me thinking about Shovlin’s mother and especially
her jigsaws. In Shovlin’s work it’s just
as much about the labour of collecting and creating than the final result.
www.trg.ed.ac.uk
http://www.bbc.co.uk:80/leicester/content/image_galleries/
jamie_shovlin_gallery.shtml?1
http://www.saatchi-gallery.co.uk/artists/jamie_shovlin_biography.htm
Do you want to add your thoughts?
Email us at percolatormag@gmail.com and we’ll put them below.
|
|