| |

Trenton Doyle Hancock:
The Wayward Thinker
Fruitmarket Gallery
Edinburgh, UK
10 Feb – 8 Apr 2007
by Rea Cris
Behold Edinburgh! This is Trenton Doyle Hancock, stepson of the unnamed
Baptist minister hailing from the lands of Paris, Texas. He is painter,
illustrator, collector and storyteller. Listen, listen! Blessed are we,
for he is here to bring to you the tale of St. Sesom and his Cult of Colour,
in his first major European solo exhibition.
Hancock’s oeuvre is a mixture of collaged paintings, prints, drawings,
sculpture and writing in biblical style depicting meta-narratives and
sub stories from his personal microcosmos, featuring his large collection
of characters. Hancock’s narrative is complex and intertwined with
fathers begetting children and illegitimate children and jealousy and
battles between good and evil. The majority of the narrative centres around
two groups: the Mounds and the Vegans. Critics and writers take great
pleasure in describing the Mounds and the Vegans, stringing together word
and word to describe each. The Mounds are the ‘good guys’
and as their name implies take the form of a mound shape with black and
white strips. Though not conscious of their goodness, Mounds tend to keep
all the good in nature flowing. Mounds are made up of moundmeat, which
is equivalent to blood and is coloured pink, which Fiona Bradley, director
for the Fruitmarket, describes as “suspiciously reminiscent of Pepto
Bismol”, but which is also conveniently the same shade of pink as
the Fruitmarket’s logo scheme. Like most of Hancock’s characters,
Mounds are derived from himself, either as alter-ego or through singled
out and exaggerated personality traits. Mounds are the result of Hancock’s
desire to paint figuratively without using the figure. Vegans, on the
other hand, are the ‘bad guys’, once human but now corrupt
from inbreeding and living underground, who have lost the ability to see
in colour. When first reading about the Vegans, I wondered whether Hancock
had simply hijacked the word and ascribed his own personal vocabulary
to it, but Hancock explains that real life vegans are painted as the personification
of good and that by making them evil sprung from taking the “ absolute
worst aspects of the group and exaggerating them to an absurd degree”.
His work has been described as the battle between good and evil, the hope
that slumbers in the minds of the weak for justice and the realization
that both good and evil spring from the same source. Knowing that Hancock
is African-American raises debates about the American Civil Rights movement;
as the jealous Vegans persecute the black and white Mounds, with their
pink moundmeat a euphemistic colour for blood. What I took from the exhibition
was a more personal struggle, a struggle I believe Hancock plays down.
As aforementioned, many of Hancock’s characters are born from within,
some as old as his childhood. Like a coping mechanism, they provide Hancock
a platform from which to safely battle his fears and understand himself.
A perfect example is Torpedo Boy, a “Linus’ blanket”
character that Hancock dons when in his studio. Torpedo Boy comes complete
with a vibrant costume that mirrors his “ bound-less energy”.
It’s important to remember that while Hancock’s work is about
meta-narratives, they cannot exist within something closer to home, internal
battles use that which we equally hope to put to rest and simultaneously
continue to nurse.
Hancock recounts his tales by painting directly onto the wall, sometimes
hanging paintings over the text, sometimes writing around the canvas.
When reading Hancock’s tale, you have to rely on memory as you shuffle
like a typewriter from the beginning of a sentence to the end. Hancock’s
paintings and prints depicting scenes from his tales are predominately
painted in black and white and pink, occasionally mixed with collaged
faux fur, bottle caps and other drawings. His character seep out from
the paintings, only just visible are their hands and feet, their knobby
fingers resembling those of the Viz comics. He used to agonize over creating
“one ultimate painting”: one epic pictorial splendour that
would encompass all his microcosmos. But it is the whole body of work
that becomes the epic painting, with the strength and freedom to be seen
collectively or separately. It has been questioned whether an audience
could be so receptive to the work without the mythology behind it, but
like all things, it helps when you know more but the lack of knowledge
does not render it impenetrable. An audience would still come away with
something, even from a sci-fi comic book background or a surrealist painterly
background.
All quotes taken directly from exhibition catalogue, available to buy
at gallery bookshop. Trenton Doyle Hancock The Wayward Thinker
A major monograph of the work of this young African-American artist.
Writers include: Fiona Bradley, Thelma Golden and Eleanor Heartney.
www.fruitmarket.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trenton_Doyle_Hancock
http://www.pbs.org/art21/artists/hancock/
Tabatha wrote:
Come on, Hancock, are vegans in real life really venerated? Seen as the
good guys? To me, they seem more like easy punching bags. Also, who knew
that vegans were united into some kind of “group”? I think
the whole narrative would be stronger without mucking about with existing
social stereotypes.
Trenton wrote:
"Dear Tabatha,
I didn't choose vegans because
of how easy it would be to take jabs at them. The vegans chose me. Assimilating
them arose from my own personal experience with REAL vegans. I suppose
I could have picked on macrobiotics, but at the time, none of them stepped
forward to annoy me. Besides, m-a-c-r-o-b-i-o-t-i-c takes so much longer
to write. Also, changing the vegans to some other group isn't going to
strengthen the narrative. The narrative is strong enough and funny enough
to suit my needs as an artist. If I felt like the writing didn't add to
my project or serve any purpose, BELIEVE ME, I wouldn't do it. I hate
spending extra energy on unnecessary pursuits. The narrative is primarily
there as a springboard to make paintings. I don't classify myself as a
writer, I'm a painter. I ONLY worry about making better paintings. Maybe
it could be fun for you to write a "fan fiction" which replaces my
vegans with alternate antagonists as you've suggested. I'd love to read
it."
Trenton Doyle Hancock
|
|